Talk:Saurabh Bagchi

Notability
MrOllie says: "You can't simulteanously claim that he's notable for programs at the IEE and that IEEE sources are independent." IEEE is the largest computing organization, a non-profit, and a neutral, widely respected organization. So I think references to IEEE articles are independent evidence of notability. Plus there are articles from several news media sources.

Sonata19 (talk) 17:07, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
 * , No. We need sources that are truly independent. This article will likely be deleted entirely without proper sourcing. MrOllie (talk) 01:54, 27 June 2021 (UTC)


 * I find the following sources to be independent: edX, Indianapolis TV station, Amazon science, NSF news story, Inside Indiana Business, ...

Techphile (talk) 20:41, 17 July 2021 (UTC)


 * .To be clear, sources must both be independent and provide substantial biographical content about Bagchi. Stuff about his business or items that simply quote him do not satisfy notability requirements. MrOllie (talk) 22:29, 17 July 2021 (UTC) a

Notability (academics)
Dr. Saurabh Bagchi meets the following conditions from WP:NACADEMIC:


 * His research has a significant impact on the "dependable computing" area. He has the 2nd highest citation in this area according to Google Scholar (8864 as of 06-25-2021).
 * His contributions to the computing field have been acknowledged by widely respected organizations like IEEE and ACM.
 * He has received important awards, such as the Friedrich Wilhelm Bessel Research Award.
 * He has lead major programs in the computing field in leading professional organizations like IEEE.

Zarghaft (talk) 09:11, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

There are several independent sources as pointed out in my above talk page post. More independent sources have been added since my post. So I am removing the warning about independent sources.

Sonata19 (talk) 01:43, 27 June 2021 (UTC)