Talk:Savage Model 110

Fair use rationale for Image:Savage 110gxp3.jpg
Image:Savage 110gxp3.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 18:33, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Merge discussion
Savage 110 BA and Savage 110FP seem to just be variants of this model - in which case they should be included here. Comments? AliveFreeHappy (talk) 20:32, 18 October 2010 (UTC)

The Savage 110 BA is not a variant of the 110FP even though they have similar numbers; the BA is a completely different gun and class. If one reads the article the variants of the BA are: the Savage 10 BAS-K and Savage Model 10 BAT/S-K. Even these are very different. Also, none of the BA information is pertinent to the FP with the exception of maybe the accutrigger. no merge.FrankWilliams (talk) 18:54, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

Redirect
Preserving here by providing this link. My rationale for the redirect was: "#REDIRECT Savage_Arms - not otherwise notable / wp:promo; redirect to section in parent company". Please let me know if there are any concerns. --K.e.coffman (talk) 16:05, 24 March 2018 (UTC)


 * Nonsense. You're not going to convince anyone that a subject that gets 5+ million ghits that it's not notable. And yet again, we see a misunderstanding of policy (i.e., WP:PROMO) being used to justify your edits. Parsecboy (talk) 19:39, 6 April 2018 (UTC)