Talk:Savanna Samson/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

I've read through the entire article and checked every source, and I honestly can't find any major problems. This is a well-written, well-sourced article.

A good article is:
 * 1) Well-written: Prose is good, MOS is good.
 * 2) Factually accurate and verifiable: Sources are good, no original research.
 * 3) Broad in its coverage: Covers main aspects, no unneeded detail.
 * 4) Neutral: Yes.
 * 5) Stable: Yes.
 * 6) Illustrated, if possible, by images: Yes.

I've made a few minor CE tweaks and additions, but otherwise, that's an easy pass. —  Hun ter   Ka  hn  04:04, 3 February 2010 (UTC)