Talk:Savanukah

Not colonial
Colonial implies at some level being under the power of a foriegn authorit. Savanukah never recognied auhority beyond the Cherokees. He should not be classed as colonial.John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:04, 17 November 2012 (UTC)


 * This is one of a number of discussions (started by John Pack Lambert) that are forked from Categories for discussion/Log/2012 November 16. Rather than conduct discussions of this topic in a dozen different places, let's have just one discussion. Please continue the discussion at the WP:CFD page. --Orlady (talk) 06:09, 18 November 2012 (UTC)