Talk:Save the Last One/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Matthew R Dunn (talk · contribs) 02:15, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello, I'll be reviewing this article. -- Matthew RD 02:15, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Criteria

 * 1) Well written: See notes below.
 * 2) Sources: Reliable and verifiable, ✅.
 * 3) Broadness in coverage: Covers the topic nicely ✅.
 * 4) Neutral: Content represents article fairly, no bias, ✅.
 * 5) Stable: No serious edit conflicts, ✅.
 * 6) Images: One non-free image, appropriately tagged, other free image checks out too, ✅.

Comments

 * In the lead section point out that Sophia is missing.


 * You could mention the critical impact of Shane shooting Otis in the lead section, seems like a rather big topic for the episode.
 * I think a lot of that is mentioned in the last paragraph already.


 * I just noticed the FA nomination for "What Lies Ahead", where the plot section was plagarised. Well unfortunately this episode's plot is the same as [www.thewalkingdeadepisode.com/the-walking-dead-2-episode-3-save-the-last-one-review/ this website]. You are not at fault DAP, but unfortunately IPs don't tend to realise how serious COPYVIO is.


 * July first -> July 1


 * Unlink Jon Bernthal in production section, per WP:REPEATLINK.


 * Howabout change "Critical reception" section to just "reception" section, as it does mention the ratings.


 * "Similarly, the episode became the second highest-rated program of the week dated October 30" You should mention the second highest-rated cable program, main network television tend to get more than one show that was seen by more than six million viewers (NCIS, Hawaii Five-0 and Grey's Anatomy for example)

The review will be on hold until the issues are resolved. -- Matthew RD 16:35, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Unless you would like me to make further adjustments to the Shane/Otis reaction, then it should be good to go. :) —DAP388 (talk) 21:09, 2 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Actually it looks good from where I'm standing (or sitting). Sorry it took me a while to respond back; I didn't put this page on my watchlist, and I was doing other Wiki things. Anyway I am happy to pass this, your first good article in the new year! -- Matthew RD 01:46, 4 January 2012 (UTC)