Talk:Saving Private Ryan/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * I tagged a couple of things that were missing cites, but I have no doubt as to their accuracy or that they can be cited in due course.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * Archiving the talk page so severely may have been appropriate, but I had to go through the article history to reassure myself that you weren't trying to hide anything.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * There's certainly room for screenshots from the movie.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Identified issues aren't sufficient to hold back from GA status. Please address them, of course. Jclemens (talk) 01:03, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Identified issues aren't sufficient to hold back from GA status. Please address them, of course. Jclemens (talk) 01:03, 14 September 2008 (UTC)