Talk:Saw 3D/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Darkwarriorblake (talk) 01:14, 26 March 2011 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for criteria)

I believe this should pass for GA, its well written and was an informative read on the subject and that is coming from someone who has personally lost interest in the franchise.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Only thing I would change, I believe there may be an overuse of images in respect to the people attending the premiere, I'd remove one or two of them, preferably at least one from the final section where it is overcrowded with them.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Congratulations, good work has been accomplished on the article.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Only thing I would change, I believe there may be an overuse of images in respect to the people attending the premiere, I'd remove one or two of them, preferably at least one from the final section where it is overcrowded with them.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Congratulations, good work has been accomplished on the article.