Talk:Sayhuite

Archaeological opinion excess
It seems the description of the site includes much opinion on the nature of archaeology and how people ought to view the subject rather than simply staying with basic description and explanation. It needs rewriting by someone who cares and knows the subject better than I. Sych (talk) 03:47, 24 August 2020 (UTC)

major details omitted
first off why is it not mentioned this stone is made from andesite which is as hard as quartz and no tools or weapons have been found in the area that would even be able to carve this hard stone? Also why is there a section talking about the generalities of preservation of archaeological sites? Sevenigma (talk) 17:21, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
 * I agree there are many important details omitted. Date? Before the Europeans which was when? When did the Incas come to this area? Chemical Engineer (talk) 15:14, 13 July 2024 (UTC)