Talk:Scaled agile framework/Archive 2./Archives/ 1

How to get this article to be more wiki-acceptable?
Davidjcmorris wrote:

I have tagged this page as requiring clean-up as it is written from an overly positive point of view (reads like marketing or a quote from a book). Please note (in the interest of full disclosure), I strongly believe that SAFe is an important and positive contribution to product development. However; this page has been created at least twice before (to my knowledge) and has been deleted for the same reason. There are many parties (rightly or wrongly) who dispute the effectiveness or efficiencies claimed for SAFe, so to be more encyclopaedic, the article should strike a more balanced note. Davidjcmorris Talk  21:28, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

From the SAFe team: Who can we work with on the Wikipedia side to ensure that this article is factual and more encyclopaedic? Right now, the SAFe team is in agreement that the current article does not sufficiently represent SAFe. It also has some factual errors. The last couple of times that we tried to fix these items directly, the page was deleted. Is there someone in the wiki community that is willing to own this page? We are happy to provide that person information about SAFe and that individual can also research any reputable sources that may provide a counterpoint.

Melissa & The SAFe team 63.225.16.218 (talk) 15:18, 28 March 2016 (UTC)