Talk:Scania Party

Move to Sweden?
Policy point number 3 says "Islam to be removed, the Muslims must move to Sweden". That can't be right; even a Muslim wouldn't want all Muslims to move to Sweden. An anti-immigration group probably wants the Muslims to move out of Sweden, not into Sweden. I almost changed it as an obvious typo, but Google Translate translates the passage as "ISLAM removed, the Muslims may move to Sweden". Art LaPella (talk) 00:29, 18 August 2008 (UTC)


 * Yes, it sounds very odd. They probably mean "other parts of Sweden". But the party programme is probably written under heavy inluence of alcohol.--Vedum (talk) 11:43, 27 December 2008 (UTC)
 * I think the point is that the Skåne Party doesn't think that Skåne should be a part of Sweden (see point 1), so when they write "to Sweden" they effectively mean "to other parts of Sweden" in the terminology of those who are not Scanian separatists. Tomas e (talk) 16:41, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The Scanian lands were ceded by Denmark to Sweden in 1658 according to the Treaty of Roskilde with promises of keeping internal self-government and the Danish language. Sweden soon broke those promises and in 1719 fully incorporated Scania into Sweden as an ordinary province. Scanian separatists think that Sweden has thereby forfeited its rights to Scania. They also do not consider themselves ethnically Swedish, but claim Scanians are a separate ethnic group with their own language (until 1890-1910 Scanian dialects based on Eastern Danish were widely spoken, so there is some historical basis for this, although modern Scanian is little more than an accent). Skåne has one of the highest concentrations of Muslims in Sweden and Skånepartiet consider this a result of an illegitimate Swedish regime. The point is that following independence all Muslims in Scania should be expelled to Sweden, since it is the Swedish government that has invited them, without the consent of the Scanian people.--Batmacumba (talk) 13:49, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Such a propagandistic bullshit! With a separatist agenda a party like this will not even get the 0,33 % it got in the last election (2014). --Vedum (talk) 19:26, 3 November 2015 (UTC)