Talk:Scanner art

Portrait Problems
How do they expect us to expand something, when the most notable expansion is considered nonsense? I've made a wonderful amount of scanner based portaits on my website and scanner art is obviously more than just sticking some leaves on a scanner. So, whats the deal here? Is it the subject, or the way that it was writen or portrayed? MalionX 15:00, 26 February 2007 (UTC)

Merger
This page has very little infomation on it. And it's pictures are the exact same ones from Image scanner, I feel that it would be best to either expand on this subject, or simply merge it with the afore mentioned article.


 * Well... for some reason that link isn't working... in either circumstance. Perhaps I've done something incorect, but I don't see it.


 * Fixed link: it was case sensitive.  freshacconci  speak to me  20:11, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

I am working with flatbed scanners and find this medium more versitile than how it is being described. Scanners are segmented image recordings which is, in my opinion, is somewhat closer to film. Each recording is captured in separate but rapidly changing time. However, the final scan gives the illusion of one moment in time, which I feel is closer to photography. With my art, I manipulate this illusion by moving images in recorded space and producing imagery that simply we cannot see in the real world yet is an actual recording of movement of all we know.”

My Self Portrait was created with an open scanner as well as the other examples. James Miller- South Texas Artist