Talk:Scanning SQUID microscopy

Merge content from Scanning SQUID microscope?
The two articles are very similar in content and there isn't much to distinguish between microscopy and microscope, so I believe that they should be merged. However, do we want to call the article 'Scanning SQUID microscope' or 'Scanning SQUID microscopy'? -- AquaDTRS (talk) 19:49, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
 * Support the merge (overlap), and could live with either title, but I prefer Scanning SQUID microscopy as the application is somewhat more likely to be of interested than the details of the machine itself (although both should certainly be covered in the article!). It also fits with precedents such as Confocal microscopy, Fluorescence-lifetime imaging microscopy, Two-photon excitation microscopy ... but admittedly not with Electron microscope. Klbrain (talk) 19:34, 12 September 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅ Klbrain (talk) 06:51, 3 January 2020 (UTC)