Talk:Scaramouche (Milhaud)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MyCatIsAChonk (talk · contribs) 13:52, 28 March 2023 (UTC)

I'll review this, looks well cited and written already! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 13:52, 28 March 2023 (UTC)


 * I think I have addressed most of the points apart from 2a part 2, which will take a little longer. As I have not implemented some changes, I will now say why:
 * Ref 6 (James) has been changed to cite paper. Unfortunately, that is the most information I can glean from the paper.
 * Refs 51 and 55 are not cite webs. They are cite magazine and cite news respectively, so I don't think I should format them as cite web. I have improved the information though.
 * Per WikiProject Albums/Sources, AllMusic IS reliable, as long as you don't use the sidebar. I didn't use the sidebar, so I don't think I need to replace those citations.
 * Almost forgot, the Radio Paris and Radio France orchestras are different entities, hence no wikilink
 * The other points have been addressed, and I will fix the other sources later. Thanks for taking on the review @MyCatIsAChonk! Schminnte (talk • contribs) 20:10, 28 March 2023 (UTC) Edited 20:22, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * (Is it your job to strike answered suggestions or mine? It's my first GAN, so I have no idea.) Schminnte (talk • contribs) 20:11, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for clarifying those things for me (I was unaware of the AllMusic policy, so this is good knowledge for the future)! I've struck through what was completed; and in my experience, the reviewer strikes through, but you could leave a comment beneath each thing with " Done" or something like that if you wanted to. Best of luck with the refs! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 21:04, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the advice, I'll get cracking on those sources tomorrow. I drafted up a sources list, so it shouldn't take too much time... fingers crossed. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 21:14, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
 * @MyCatIsAChonk, I believe I have addressed the remaining issues. Please see the implemented changes. Thanks, Schminnte (talk • contribs) 15:54, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your quick fixes! There's one last thing to be addressed- the sources list needs to be alphabetized. Once that's done, you're good to go for GA! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 23:02, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
 * @MyCatIsAChonk, I have alphabetised the list and changed the formatting of the refs section (I think it looks better). Thanks for your help. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 10:44, 30 March 2023 (UTC)
 * Wonderful, this article is good for GA! Congratulations! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) 12:57, 30 March 2023 (UTC)