Talk:Scarborough Castle

Keep
Let's keep the article for now please. There is much history to write about this castle. – Kaihsu 17:24, 16 May 2006 (UTC)

Assessment summary
Keith D 11:06, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * 1) Requires infobox
 * 2) Requires addition of further inline references using one of the Cite templates
 * 3) Existing references need tidy for dates
 * 4) Expand on history

Copy editing
It may be worth doing some copy-editing from http://en.citizendium.org/wiki/Scarborough_Castle as the licenses are compatible. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.44.17.78 (talk) 17:23, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Reordered
I put the History section first as it seemed more logical. Feel free to revert but I think it might help explain the archaeology if the history goes first. The features/archaeology section, I find very confusing, to say the least, but I will attempt to make more sense of it later. It's possible I will be visiting Scarborough later in the month so I might even visit the castle.--J3Mrs (talk) 09:22, 15 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Many thanks.--Harkey (talk) 20:30, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Plan of the castle
http://www.flickr.com/photos/britishlibrary/11244849093/

©Geni (talk) 00:51, 16 December 2013 (UTC)

former medieval Royal fortress?
formerly medieval? formerly Royal? formerly a fortress? formerly medieval Royal? "formerly Royal, now ruined, medieval fortress"?

Reportedly Haunted Category
As I can’t see any reference to reports of the castle being “haunted”, would anyone object if I removed the Category? KJP1 (talk) 07:37, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * There is a short sentence about ghosts in the Scarborough Castle section. Regards. The joy of all things (talk) 08:34, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Ah, well spotted. KJP1 (talk) 09:26, 9 March 2021 (UTC)