Talk:Scarfolk

Notability?
I'm a big fan of the website, but is it notable enough to warrant a Wikipedia page? It seems little more than an advert for the book ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 10:12, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
 * No objections after a week: I've nominated the page for deletion. I am aware that there is a previous nomination, but given that there has been no further work since then, the book is nothing more than a passing novelty ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 14:30, 12 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Yes I think there is enough notability. The Scarfolk site is still very active, just yesterday there is news of a upcoming you tube channel. just before christmas there was some starwars medical merch. . These show there is more than just the book. A merge might be in order, but perhaps the other way as this page has the broader scope. As there is scope for discussion I've declined the prod. --Salix alba (talk): 15:08, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I nominated for deletion last time round. Continued coverage and activity has definitely pushed the site into notability for me now. However, I think the book article might be better just being merged into this as it has minimal content. Blythwood (talk) 04:56, 13 January 2016 (UTC)

✅

More controversy - worth a mention?
UK government accidentally included Scarfolk poster, in some material and received a C&D.

Reference to article in Boing Boing.

Jonasbn —Preceding undated comment added 20:42, 20 July 2018 (UTC)