Talk:Scatter Their Own

Untitled
Rachel Glait Peer Review

I think your article is off to a great start. Your introduction gives a clear idea about what "Scatter Their Own" is, however I believe that addition information could help make your article more informative. What songs have they come out with? Albums? How successful are they? Have they performed concerts? In addition, I think including pictures of the duo or a logo (if they have one) would also help to make your article seem more professional. I believe it would be beneficial for you too look up other bands on Wikipedia and seek inspiration from their formats and the information that they provide. Also you should definitely include more substantial sources.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Andrewjung1. Peer reviewers: Anacharco.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:22, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Richy Tochihuitl Peer Review
In regards to errors, the writing itself seems grammatically correct. Still, there is the one part of the article where a hyphen was used to bring in the quote from the source. This part of the article is a bit awkward due to the use of the verb "traveling." I would suggest changing the verb to "[travel]" if you wish to keep the quote. The article does seem unbiased as you do adopt more of a formal tone and it does seem attention grabbing even with the small amount of text you have provided. Nonetheless, I think you should include evidence of the impact they have had such as to which extent they have had an impact against events that affect the indigenous population. Lastly, I would suggest include sources that are more reliable instead of just using a Facebook post to bring in relevant information about the band. Even if there are no scholarly articles,you should at least include popular sources like magazines and newspaper articles discussing the band. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Richy Tochihuitl (talk • contribs) 21:38, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Ana Charco Peer Review
After reading your article, it is clear that it is unbiased since you are mentioning what the Rock duo represented and what they were trying to engage through there music. However, you should focus on the effect that the music had on different populations and how the music connected them. In addition, you should look for more sources to further support your claims, which will allow you to have credibility. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anacharco (talk • contribs) 21:51, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

Nicholas Stefanoni Peer Review:

Your introductory paragraph is concise, yet offers a perfect amount of information. The phrasing is unbiased and clearly shows what the bands purpose is outside of music. There was one grammatical error in this paragraph. As I look at your outline, I think some of your topics may be a bit outside of the ream of Scatter Their Own. While you may want to mention the sacredness of water for example, I would caution you abut going to in-depth, as it is not the band's central focus. In your last paragraph you stray a little bit outside of the band's role in the Dakota Pipeline, but the concluding sentence ties the information together nicely. In general, the tone is unbiased and you offer a detailed synopsis of the band's background and some notable events they took part in. I think you could benefit about mentioning some of the specific music Scatter Their Own has released and their most influential songs. It could also be helpful to know how famous they are among Native American artists, in order to know how well their message will be received. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewjung1 (talk • contribs) 04:26, 26 March 2018 (UTC)