Talk:Scene (fashion)

This article needs to be created
You guys gotta stop denying not only the existence of Scene, but the UBUITQUITY of it. seriously, look at all these sites, it's not some obscure neologism: Lampsalot (talk) 17:00, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
 * http://www.wikihow.com/Be-a-Scene-Kid
 * http://www.scenekidsearch.com/
 * google "scene kid" About 239,000 results (0.30 seconds)
 * http://www.scenehairtutorial.com/
 * http://scenegirls.org/
 * http://scenegirls.net/
 * http://sceneboys.net/
 * 6,458 results for "scene kid" on Yahoo Answers
 * http://www.smh.com.au/news/national/scene-kids-are-like-so-not-wannabe-emos/2008/03/29/1206207488553.html


 * As I pointed out on your talk page, articles on "scene" have been deleted from Wikipedia over a dozen times. Whether the term is ubiquitous is irrelevant; many neologisms are ubiquitious. The presence of fan sites, forums, and wikis does not equate notability (you can get thousands of hits for anything on Google, which is why Google hits are not an indicator of a topic's suitability for an encyclopedia...see WP:GHITS). The major problem here is finding reliable, authoritative secondary sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy. Forums, fansites, and wikis do not meet this criteria (see WP:RS). The fact that the common "sources" that keep coming up in support of this topic are all bottom-of-the-internet-barrel blogs/forums/etc. indicates that this is not (yet) a suitable topic for Wikipedia. If it were, reliable sources such as news/fashion/music publications would be easy to find. --IllaZilla (talk) 17:39, 20 January 2011 (UTC)


 * so essentially you're telling me there's no such thing as a scene kid? Lampsalot (talk) 22:51, 20 January 2011 (UTC)


 * That's not even remotely (and much less essentially) what IllaZilla is saying. Please read the message and the linked policies again. --bonadea contributions talk 22:56, 20 January 2011 (UTC)