Talk:Schedule of reinforcement

Since no one has added anything to this article in two months, and since schedules of reinforcement are discussed much more extensively in the Reinforcement article, and since I can't get the article listed for deletion, I'm redirecting it to Reinforcement. I don't see having a separate article for schedules unless the original article becomes too large. I especially don't see having a separate article with so little information in it. John FitzGerald 14:38, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

I approve John FitzGerald's action above. However, I have now expanded this article in a way that wouldn't be appropriate in the main reinforcement article, so I hope he, and others, will be happy for this now to become an independent article. Some of what is in under reinforcement could perhaps be copied or moved here now. This version needs some more references, e.g. Zeiler, and Skinner's "case history" paper; I will get those when I have time. seglea 20:34, 3 June 2006 (UTC)