Talk:School of Diplomacy

diplomacy?
If, as the article suggests, these "diplomats" (against which the author seems to be rather biased) did nothing else but advocating attacking each other, why then are they called "diplomats", a diplomat - first and formost, I would say - trying to solve conflicts by way of talks...? Or were these only talks to prepare war? --HilmarHansWerner (talk) 16:54, 14 August 2017 (UTC)