Talk:Science/to do

You might start with talk:science/Archive 5, October 2011, for a group effort at a Good Article.
 * add criticism
 * add inline citations
 * achieve NPOV in method and philosophical sections
 * "The principal elements of the nature of science: Dispelling the myth" reference to Direct instruction news as a source is false. The source cannot be found in the 2002 Spring release.✅ RockMagnetist (talk) 16:43, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
 * achieve consistency with other science related pages of Wikipedia RockMagnetist (talk) 16:54, 9 March 2012 (UTC)

  '''
 * Science brief definitions:
 * Science=Logic+Observations'''
 * Empirical Sciences = Observations OR Experiments OR Mathematical Modeling OR Computational Modeling = partial evidence for supporting or rejecting ideas, with strong effort to avoid logical or statistical falacies in this supporting process.'''
 * Formal Sciences = Deductive reasoning from formal systems of axioms and definitions: Mathematics, Logics and Theoretical Computation'''
 * Add discussion to Literature section on ownership, copyright, Creative Commons
 * Add UC Berkeley's "How Science Works" as a "Resource" - http://undsci.berkeley.edu/article/howscienceworks_01 ✅ RockMagnetist (talk) 21:32, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Make the first link go to philosophy or some other page (other than latin or knowledge) to avoid a loop which will never terminate at the philosophy page. Biran4454 (talk) 15:05, 10 July 2020 (UTC)