Talk:Science & Faith Tour

Table format
Since my table format has been reverted twice without any edit summaries or talk page discussion, I am opening up a discussion here. First, the section headings are completely unnecessary in a table. Second, the forced widths of the columns only seem to be there to try and fill the entire screen when it should simply be the largest entry in any given column. Third, the "big" formatting just seem to make the words extra-bold, when one level of boldness is all that is necessary. Aspects (talk) 04:38, 3 November 2010 (UTC)

Hi, I would just like to say that you have not created this page, therefore you should not change it. I change the format table because i feel it looks much better. It took me a while to put all the information onto the page and i'd appreciate if you wouldnt change it anymore. I have changed the width of the table so it will not take up the whole page. Handsopened (talk) 13:45, 5 November 2010


 * Just because you started the article, does not mean you WP:OWN it. Once a Wikipedia article is in the mainspace, any editor can edit it.  Since your only argument seems to be of WP:ILIKEIT, I am going to restore the more commonly accepted version. Per WP:BRD, you need to discuss this with other editors, instead of continually reverting. Aspects (talk) 21:02, 5 November 2010 (UTC)


 * If you actually look closely to the category that its in you will see that the table format which I use is used by quite a lot of other users. I know that just because I created it, that doesnt mean I own it but it does give me the right to change it back to what I had in the first place. Handsopened (talk) 22:26, 7 November 2010


 * "I know that just because I created it, that doesnt mean I own it but it does give me the right to change it back to what I had in the first place." is the exact definition of owning an article. Just because you wrote it does not mean you get to change it back to the way you prefer the article to be when you never explained why you were making the reversions. Aspects (talk) 05:55, 8 November 2010 (UTC)


 * I am going to change the tables to what I consider a good compromise. The flagicons go against WP:ICONDECORATION and were added back without any explanation.  Also there has no been no demonstrated need forthe section headings in the tables, so they should be removed. From your statements here, I assume you are more interested in the "looks" as in the widths of the chart, so I am leaving those as is.  Please discuss here these changes here instead of reverting. Aspects (talk) 23:09, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Addition
Somehow the appearance at Z100's Jingle Ball 2011 concert on December 9th, 2011 should be placed into the chart somehow. They also played the pre-concert Coca-Cola All Access Lounge. I am not sure if they did any other promotions during the month of December 2011.