Talk:Science Initiative Group

Messy promotional article, all primary sources
Posting this here first in case anyone might want to improve the article. As far as I can tell, there is not currently even one good reliable secondary source, making this a promotional extension of the group's website (which, indeed, per the OTRS notice above, it includes material from). Much of the content looks to have been added by someone with a conflict of interest as well (per the staff page). Wikipedia only covers aspects of a subject as they are covered in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject. As an encyclopedia rather than an organization's website, there's nothing indicating this shouldn't be redirected to Institute for Advanced Study. None of this is to say it isn't a worthy or important group doing good work -- but Wikipedia is not a place for promotion regardless. &mdash;  Rhododendrites talk  \\ 15:34, 20 October 2015 (UTC)