Talk:Science and Development Network

Wouldn't have this was a speedy. Would have thought it a AFD. -- Oscar The Cat talk 19:14, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

commercial v npo ads?
Given SciDev.Net is not a commercial organisation, has no commercial interests, doesn't have anything to sell (even web subscriptions) and is mostly funded by charitable and public sector organisations, I think it's a bit harsh to call its article an advert.

After all, Wikipedia has entries for Oxfam, Science and Nature. Only one of those is an npo, and all of them have products to sell.

But I'd agree that the language of this article needs to be changed to make it NPOV. Anyone with good editing skills want to have a go?

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Science and Development Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080313024911/http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-1-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html to http://www.idrc.ca/en/ev-1-201-1-DO_TOPIC.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 11:18, 7 December 2017 (UTC)