Talk:Science and technology in Israel/Archive 1

POV
very pov article. every sentence is just gushing with praise for israeli technology.

But is that not what this article is about.


 * Indeed, comparing to Science and technology in China or Brazilian science and technology, this is pretty gushy. Probably the best thing to do is instead of saying, "Israel has a high reputation in..." is to actually list specific contributions or elements which contribute to its reputation.  Alternatively, we could find surveys which rank the top countries with regard to innovation in certain fields, or more concretely, top institutions, and say specifically where Israel falls in the rankings, rather than using vague and somewhat subjective superlatives. -- Beland 02:23, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

the full list of contributions cannot be listed, and listing the major ones is problematic as you have to choose what a major invention is. i beleive the correct aproach whould be statistics, comparison, and maybe one or two examples.

Specific Statistic
I remember seeing an article in the Times that talked about research around the world, they had a bar graph that said that Israel is #1 technology exporting per capita country in the world. This was now a couple of years ago, but I think we should write in the article that in that particular year, Israel was #1 research per capita exporting. Does anyone know where to find that Times article? —Preceding unsigned comment added by JanTervel (talk • contribs) 06:55, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Lists
I'm not sure this article should be bogged down with lists of companies. Better to have links to the articles about these companies in the body of the text, explaining their contribution. Any thoughts?--Gilabrand (talk) 07:27, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Agree. Let's mention the companies in the relevant sections in the text and delete them from the lists so that the lists can be eliminated. -- Chefallen (talk) 07:42, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

Issues with the article (pre-GAR comments)
Like I said on WT:Israel, the article is a good collaboration between Gilabrand and Chefallen, and I applaud them for their effort in improving an actually important article for WP Israel. Having said that, I have found the following major issues with the article (other than copyright problems) that, IMO, make it non-GA-worthy at this point:


 * 1) The structure and style is lacking—i.e. the history section begins with "The foundations of agricultural research in Israel were laid ..." → requires at least a basic explanation about how the first major leaps in science and technology in Israel were agriculture-related, i.e. how the sentence is relevant to the article's topic. An example of how to do this right comes in the Environmental science section.
 * 2) To expand on the above, there are a number of very short sections and paragraphs in the article, which in some places are little more than lists of loosely-related accomplishments. See for example Computer engineering section. In addition there is an actual list (companies), something that doesn't belong in a GA.
 * 3) The formatting of the article is terrible (ref formatting, spacing, etc.). I might help with that if time allows.
 * 4) Some sections which are fairly important lack content/depth. For instance, the Scientific institutions section only lists the institutions, without elaborating on what they are known. Surely universities are not the only scientific institutions in Israel, and not the only bodies that do research.

I look forward to seeing the article grow and improve further! —Ynhockey (Talk) 00:18, 23 December 2009 (UTC)


 * Also needed is to add information about the numbers and qualifications of personell engaged in this area, and note the impact of Russian immigration (due to the high proportion of those immigrants who are doctors, scientists, and engineers) and the military, particularly as these contributed to advancements in various scientific fields, especially computer technologies. -- Chefallen (talk) 17:30, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

National vs. Private efforts?
In the "Space science" section of the article, where the "further information" points to the national space program of Israel, the whole section seems to have a POV of the national/governmental efforts is space, with no focus at all on commercial efforts?

Does the reader of Wikipedia correctly infer that there is not much if any private activity in the space science and spaceflight sector within Israel? Or are we just missing something? Cheers. N2e (talk) 12:16, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page
Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:


 * http://www.water-technology.net/projects/israel/
 * Triggered by  on the local blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 11:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

✅ This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.— cyberbot II NotifyOnline 19:36, 9 April 2014 (UTC)