Talk:Science in newly industrialized countries

Article Tone
This article seems to be just of one persons opinion or thoughts on this subject matter. It doesnt seem to be very accurate and seems to be making massive assumptions about countries histories and about science. (17:57, 21 January 2012‎) (by 31.205.28.203)

POV problems
Many of the claims made in the article sound like they should be controversial, and yet only one point of view is presented throughout. Explanations of why certain countries have advanced science and technology are an area of active controversy in sociology and the history of science. -- Beland (talk) 06:04, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Anyone is welcome to improve the article on those countsHallenrm (talk) 17:58, 23 June 2008 (UTC)

Major rewriting or deletion
I want to pose an appeal for major rewriting or deletion of this article, because of a deeply ingrained one-sided narration of interpretations of critically discussed issues of socio-historical science, in this article!? Nsae Comp (talk) 23:33, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Science in newly industrialized countries. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071215061136/http://www.mre.gov.br/cdbrasil/itamaraty/web/ingles/economia/ctec/panhist/apresent.htm to http://www.mre.gov.br/cdbrasil/itamaraty/web/ingles/economia/ctec/panhist/apresent.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 03:57, 23 February 2016 (UTC)