Talk:Scientific consensus on global warming

This article seems to cover identical groud to Scientific opinion on climate change. Is there any reason to have this article? --Axon 12:56, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)


 * (William M. Connolley 13:56, 12 Nov 2004 (UTC)) Probably not. I've hacked it anyway, but can't really see the point in re-opening the same arguments on yet another page.


 * (William M. Connolley 21:05, 14 Nov 2004 (UTC)) And on review I made it a redirect as Axon suggested.


 * It doesn't seem to be redirecting any more, it comes up if that title is searched for. Sln3412 22:59, 12 August 2006 (UTC)


 * Blame Ed. I've speedied it William M. Connolley 21:53, 13 August 2006 (UTC)


 * "Who deserves the credit? Who deserves the blame? Nikolai Ivanovich Lobachevskii is his name!" (with apologies to Tom Lehrer)
 * You see, William, I've been saying all along that there no Scientific consensus on global warming! ;-) --Uncle Ed 18:45, 14 August 2006 (UTC)


 * :-) William M. Connolley 19:43, 14 August 2006 (UTC)


 * lol  !!!!!     -- btw I put in a redirect on it.  ;^) Sln3412 20:48, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Repoint
It is proposed to repoint the page to Climate change consensus shortly. Please record any concerns with proceeding. Thanks. ‒ Jaymax✍ 10:11, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I concur. --GoRight (talk) 14:28, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

You did this on the 15th; I disagreed; nothong has changed since then. Why does this page even exist? It is an unlikely misspelling William M. Connolley (talk) 21:39, 27 December 2009 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Scientific opinion on climate change which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 09:14, 2 June 2019 (UTC)