Talk:Scofield Reservoir

Merger proposal
It seems that we could merge Scofield Dam into this article (including a redirect) and create a single, well-crafted, complete article from these two. We could even redirect Scofield State Park to here and put information relevant to the state park status into this article. I've also noticed that the majority of the information on Scofield Dam is already on Scofield Reservoir. Having two serparate articles looks a little redundant right now.

Any objections? DeFaultRyan (talk) 19:03, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Great idea. This is just what should happen. Be my guest. Ntsimp (talk) 23:09, 30 September 2008 (UTC)

Rating (WP Lakes assessment)
I have made this a C-class, alongside the WP Utah rating, as though the article has a sufficient amount of content to reach B, it needs much more inline citations that are properly done with the citation template. --  ʄɭoʏɗiaɲ  τ ¢  21:13, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Assessment comment
Substituted at 05:35, 30 April 2016 (UTC)