Talk:Scorched Earth (Law & Order: Special Victims Unit)

Plot
I've rewritten the plot to be less wordy. i don't think it's a good idea to name drop everyone. Cutter was there, for instance, but I think we shouldn't mention him unless we mention the sub-plot that he wanted to drop the case after the tape surfaced while Cabot insisted that it go forward. Likewise, the name of the defense lawyer is not important to the plot. I've also condensed the Elliot subplot to just two sentences and gave some background. hbdragon88 (talk) 23:54, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Reviews - to include or not to include
Currently, the reception section of this article only mentions the ratings from the episode's original broadcast. I'd like to add some reviews, as well, so I found this or this from a very lucky Google search. Would either of these sites be reliable enough to cite in the article? A little expansion of the section wouldn't hurt--but at the same time, I wouldn't want to use one of these articles if they turn out to be no better than the typical blog that one would find on blogspot or whatever. --Davejohnsan (talk) 18:37, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * The New York Times review definitely, the NoWhiteNoise.com one, I'm not so sure about. — Mike  Allen   00:30, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Okay, I've added in the NY Times review; please feel free to make any changes. I think one more review would be ideal for the article, but other than that, I think it's just about ready for GA. --Davejohnsan (talk) 03:04, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Would this be okay? --Davejohnsan (talk) 03:07, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * TVFanatic.com is part of SheKnows Entertainment which is a division of AtomicOnline (which operates a site that Wikipedia regardes as a reliable source -- CraveOnline). I don't see why not. — Mike   Allen   03:17, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Done, please let me know what you think. --Davejohnsan (talk) 03:57, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Looks good. — Mike  Allen   05:56, 27 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Awesome! I'll see what other improvements I can make before I nominate it for GA status. --Davejohnsan (talk) 19:40, 27 December 2011 (UTC)