Talk:Scorpia (journalist)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Adog (talk · contribs) 13:57, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

How is it going? I will take on this review and likely complete it by Sunday, August 13, or unlikely Monday, August 14. Seems like an interesting article and I look forward to reading! Adog ( Talk ・ Cont ) 13:57, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello once again. For my GA reviews, I provide comments and suggestions for grammar and sentence structure for the editor-at-large. If you do not agree with a suggestion, think it is improper or inappropriate for the content, you do not have to implement it. With that, this should be my shortest review thus far. The below is for my first skim through. I will read it more thoroughly after:

Lead

 * She was fired after CGW was sold to Ziff-Davis in 1999, and she subsequently retired from games journalism. This sentence could possibly do without the second "she".
 * Done. GamerPro64  03:40, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Career

 * Her initial intention was ... to She initially intended for fewer words and readability?
 * Done. GamerPro64  03:40, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * She became known for harsh criticism of video games she disliked. CGW thus billed her as "controversial," might be better without the comma. If the comma is still functional, on Wikipedia, they are located outside quotes I believe per MOS:LQ.
 * Done. GamerPro64  04:50, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Same with the quote about the comma need to be placed outside: CGW editor Johnny Wilson described Scorpia as "one of the most refreshing people you could ever meet," ...
 * Done. GamerPro64  04:50, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * However, he also cited one example where the two clashed, over the role-playing game Darklands. I would remove this comma, as it adds a slight stop when there should not be a pause.
 * Done. GamerPro64  04:50, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Scorpia wrote a negative review that criticized the game's bugs, and Wilson attached an editorial sidebar that gave a more positive view. may read better as Scorpia wrote a negative review criticizing the game's bugs, and Wilson attached an editorial sidebar with a more positive view.
 * Done. GamerPro64  04:50, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Starting from the sentence She subsequently started a free website, where she blogged. and beyond, there is a lot of repetition of "She". I would change some to "Scorpia" to reduce redundancy as the reader will think about "she, she, she".
 * Might have to think of alternatives since using Scorpia would also become redundant. GamerPro64  04:50, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
 * She insisted it was "really more work than most people realize," ... Comma outside of the quote.
 * Done. GamerPro64  04:50, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

Additional comments or concerns

 * ... and she said she bought her first computer ... runs a bit awkward. Since it is part of an interview, I would consider rephrasing this to something like: ... and in an interview with writer [Insert name] on RampantGames.com, Scorpia mentioned she bought her first computer ... or ... and in an interview with a writer on RampantGames.com, Scorpia mentioned she bought her first computer ...
 * Used the second suggestion. GamerPro64  03:59, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 * This is a really bad idea, and I'm strongly tempted to revert it. Please remove this.  It doesn't matter where she said it.  This kind of attribution is only necessary for opinion-based statements, as in WP:ATTRIBUTEPOV.  Attributing content unnecessarily like this runs counter to WP:NPOV itself, which says "Uncontested and uncontroversial factual assertions made by reliable sources should normally be directly stated in Wikipedia's voice."  If people want this kept, I would really like to see a quotation from a guideline or policy that explicitly says this is necessary. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 01:51, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Ah, then the mistake is on me. As per my statement above, editors know certain areas (policy, genre, functions) more than I do, and I am not opposed to, or admitting to, a mistake in judgment or perception of such. If by people, you mean me, I have gone ahead and reverted it to its previous version. What tripped me up is part of the statement "she said she", which I have not seen elsewhere, and was not sure we can attribute the primary subject to her own words in the article; thus, my suggestion. Is the present satisfactory or should the statement still need a re-wording? Thank you for your input and providing a well-intentioned explanation! :) Adog  ( Talk ・ Cont ) 12:46, 28 August 2023 (UTC)


 * In addition to her writing and online presence, she provided hints to players ... I assume "hints" here is like a hint you get from looking up what to do next when you get stuck on a level or a quest or a mission. I would revise it here for clarity, or if the hint means something different, revise for that.
 * I added "game" to the sentence. GamerPro64  03:59, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 * The sentence: CGW editor Johnny Wilson described Scorpia as "one of the most refreshing people you could ever meet," and he praised her encyclopedic knowledge of games' puzzles. does not have a reference after the sentence, although I assume it is 8 at the end of the paragraph. I believe anytime you quote, you should have the ref. at the end of the sentence for the reader's clarity, even if the whole paragraph is cited by one source per WP:MOS.
 * That's fair. Done. GamerPro64  03:59, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 * To reduce said, per MOS:SAID, the sentence: She said that someone intimated to her ... I would rephrase to: Scorpia stated that someone intimated to her ...
 * Done. GamerPro64  03:59, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 * I would wikilink "subscription webzine" to Online magazine.
 * Done. GamerPro64  03:59, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 * She said she was already known as Scorpia because of her work ..., same issue with RampantGames interview, I would rephrase to In an interview with Arinn Dembo of Gamasutra, Scorpia stated she was already known by the pseudonym because of her work ...
 * Done. GamerPro64  03:59, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 * At CGW, only owner Sipe knew her real name runs a bit awkward. It may benefit from some added words: At CGW, only the owner, Sipe, knew her real name.
 * Done. GamerPro64  03:59, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Her favorite video game is Ultima IV: Quest of the Avatar. Seems like an oddball fact in the section. I say that since my favorite games change every so often, and songs change every week. Was it her favorite video game she reviewed, or of all time? Is there relevance to her personal life?
 * I mean, if you're a film critic, like Roger Ebert, who has sections on his favorite films, I think that information would be fine if a game critics favorite game is mentioned. GamerPro64  03:59, 27 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Valid, valid. I do agree. Adog  ( Talk ・ Cont ) 20:30, 28 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Ref 4-5, is that a reliable source? Seems like a blog (WP:SPS), and I am not sure if the author is well-established in his field. Also, ref. 4 links to the comments and not the article for some reason.
 * For a bit of background, see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games/Archive 130 and User talk:Ylee. I think pretty much all the citations to this source were added by one person, and there's been some debate as to whether the blog is a reliable source. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 15:34, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Awesome! That is exactly what I was looking for. Maybe worth another discussion or post on WikiProject Video games/Sources. I liked this WikiProject's page so much, we are currently making one for WP:APARKS inspired by it to better help during GA/FA reviews, general passerby comments/concerns, or our own members use. Apart from nerding out there, I am willing to accept this source based on the previous discussions. Adog  ( Talk ・ Cont ) 20:30, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

*She insisted it was "really more work than most people realize," is missing a quote in the quote, so "'really more work than most people realize'", Since doing GA reviews, I come to know and  is a thing! I would suggest using these for this. Adog ( Talk ・ Cont ) 20:30, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
 * According to refs. 1 and 9, they seem to imply that Scorpia left the magazine rather than being fired, which would contradict the statement: Scorpia was fired after CGW was sold to Ziff Davis in 1999. The following sentence has the same issue: She said that someone intimated to her that the magazine wanted to go in a different direction as both 1 and 9 imply that she observed this regime change-in-direction rather than another person relaying this info to her.
 * Reading Scorpia's interview with Game Developer, it seems like she was let go along with others: "The mag changed a great deal after Russ sold it to Ziff-Davis. A number of people from the "Russ regime" were dropped besides me. CGW was going in a different direction, and I, among others, didn't fit in with it. That wasn't said to me in so many words, but it came through. Seeing what CGW eventually became, overall, I'm not too sorry that I left it. However, I don't believe that being a woman had anything to do with being dropped. This was something more in the "new broom" mold than anything else." GamerPro64  05:44, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Interesting, there seems to be a mix of wording. I do see your point re-reading this some time later. Adog  ( Talk ・ Cont ) 13:14, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Well written + verifiability
The article is pretty well written, with some grammatical or sentence structure issues to be addressed. The general manual of style is ok, with some minor fixes needed. The article has a proper reference layout with no major outstanding issues. I do have some questions about some of the source's reliability or statement of facts that are presented. Please see above. According to Earwig, likely no issues, but looking at the first source there is a phrase similar to one in the article, I would double check and possibly rephrase. I checked all the sources since the article is small. I have just a few issues with some sources. See the above as well. Adog ( Talk ・ Cont ) 19:02, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Broadness + focus + neutral
The article is broad in scope and focused on the subject. It is nice and concise. The article fairly portrays Scorpia and herself. I do not have any issues with the overall content. Adog ( Talk ・ Cont ) 19:02, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Images + stability

 * The article is stable, as there are no ongoing or active edit conflicts. The one image is relevant to the article, and its paperwork is in order. Adog  ( Talk ・ Cont ) 16:05, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Alright, my bud, I have fully reviewed the article. I do have some concerns and questions about the above, some from my general knowledge and some from not understanding the genre of video game articles that are fully on Wikipedia. I want to make sure the ducks are in a row for this article since it is short. I will put this on hold if not edited in 48 hours to give you time or if you are busy. :) Adog  ( Talk ・ Cont ) 19:02, 13 August 2023 (UTC)


 * Slowly getting this done. I'm going on vacation soon so this might be slow. GamerPro64  03:40, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * @GamerPro64 All good, thank you for letting me know! I will also be on vacation from August 23-26 to let you know as well. Though, I will be around if you need anything before or after. :) Mainly doing the GAN Drive this month to get some experience reviewing and to expand my knowledge on wonderful subjects such as this! Adog  ( Talk ・ Cont ) 05:23, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Courtesy ping for the one-week mark. I will put the article on hold as well. Adog  ( Talk ・ Cont ) 02:51, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Also as a side note, I will be departing on vacation from August 23-26. If you happen to complete the fixes during that time, know that I am temporarily unavailable but will be back to answer or assist. Adog  ( Talk ・ Cont ) 05:25, 22 August 2023 (UTC)