Talk:Scotland in the Middle Ages/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Droodkin (talk · contribs) 22:27, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Alright, I'll be starting the review. Since the article is a pretty long one, this is going to take a while so have patience. So let's get started! --Droodkin (talk) 22:27, 25 August 2012 (UTC)

Update: Okay, finished reading and here's the review. GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * There are some personal pronouns (all of which are "we") which could pose a problem as per WP:TONE. However, in my view, it is acceptable (following WP:IAR.) Also, unnecessary capitalisations of words in mid-sentence (like "as an Artillery fort" in the Architecture section) are present.
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * All links are working, no dead links. The article is sufficiently cited with books.
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * All major aspects that I expected were included.
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * No bias, as far as I can see. It's neutral.
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * Choice of images are good and relevant to their respective sections.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * This article passes the requirements for WP:GA, congratulations.
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * Choice of images are good and relevant to their respective sections.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * This article passes the requirements for WP:GA, congratulations.
 * This article passes the requirements for WP:GA, congratulations.

--Droodkin (talk) 12:39, 26 August 2012 (UTC)