Talk:Scott Boerma

Free Image?
A free image of Mr. Boerma to grace his page would be wonderful... Vicenarian (T · C) 17:03, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes, I agree. Sadly, nothing turns up on Flickr and the pictures of him everywhere else seem to be copyrighted. :( - T'Shael,  Lord of the Vulcans  17:11, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Could possibly attempt to contact him, explain that you'd like a picture of him (freely-licensed) for use on his page. I did that with Lucy Activewear. The director of PR was ecstatic and promise to get me all sorts of photos and such for the page. Still haven't gotten any of those, but it's a way to go. Vicenarian  (T · C) 17:19, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
 * Great minds must think alike, because as soon as I hit "save page" earlier, I thought that I could possibly email him and explain to him why I needed a free licensed picture of him. That's a great idea, thanks. :) - T'Shael,  Lord of the Vulcans  17:21, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

Class
I see a massive gap between start- and C-class here. Judging by the criteria, I was going to bump this up to C, but then I looked at the example. Then I looked at the example for start. There is a massive jump. This follows all the criteria of C, but more than start. It is immensely more referenced than a start, or even a C. An enjoyable read. Well done Javert. – B.hotep •talk• 22:36, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

Deletion
I flagged this page for deletion because there is nothing notable about this person and the entire page is unsourced. And there's a link to purchase one of his CDs.

Speedy deletion nomination of Scott Boerma


A tag has been placed on Scott Boerma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Eezurr (talk) 14:42, 21 January 2021 (UTC)