Talk:Scott H. Stalker

Possible copyright violation
While it appears I was wrong about this article being a hoax it is a direct copy from |here. Does this constitute copyvio? DesertPipeline (talk) 13:09, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Furthermore, my attempts to establish if this person is notable are coming up nil here, especially because of the lack of news article. May have to take it to AfD for notability. DesertPipeline (talk) 13:15, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Hey DesertPipeline. The Defense Intelligence Agency is a federal government agency, and works of US federal government employees created in the course of their duties are public domain. You may, of course, open a discussion at AfD if you would like.  G M G  talk   13:27, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I'd like to give you some time to establish notability of the subject. If that can't be done, then yeah, I'll open a discussion at AfD. Good luck. DesertPipeline (talk) 13:30, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Well, I've fleshed it out a little more, and I don't like relying on SNGs to establish notability (and almost never do), but I think there's a good case to be made for WP:NSOLDIER #3, being CSEL of both Cybercom and the DIA, as well as the first person to hold both positions.  G M G  talk   14:36, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
 * Incidentally, in case they decide to log back on, it's possible that User:MGySgt Scott H. Stalker can point to a great deal more sources that may be available.  G M G  talk   14:39, 20 March 2018 (UTC)