Talk:Scott Hassan

Divorce details removed as "poorly sourced material" by anonymous user even though they had a source from the New York Times
This is the edit that removes the section: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scott_Hassan&oldid=1126363747

Before the edit the section is visible: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scott_Hassan&oldid=1122858788 by anonymous user with IP 24.6.226.102 (California).

This is the New York Times source: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/08/20/technology/Scott-Hassan-Allison-Huynh-divorce.html

A second edit by the same IP 24.6.226.102 removed another usage of the same reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Scott_Hassan&diff=1126364005&oldid=1126363892

Without further explanation why it is poorly sourced, this edit feels very suspicious, there's a chance it might have been made by Scott or his supporters as the section contained information about him that might be seen as negative or sensitive.

User:24.6.226.102 Could you provide further justification why the New York article is "poorly sourced material"?

Asking for 3rd opinion at: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Third_opinion&oldid=1129717858#Active_disagreements I'm not waiting for the editor to reply because it was an anonymous edit, not sure exactly how anonymous user communication is possible at all.

Cirosantilli2 (talk) 20:01, 26 December 2022 (UTC)