Talk:Scott James Remnant

Untitled
Does Scott still work Canonical? Perhaps I misinterpreted something on someone else's twitter feed :)

82.69.60.196 (talk) 22:14, 26 October 2010 (UTC)

Notable
WP:NOTABILITY: If a topic has received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject, it is presumed to satisfy the inclusion criteria for a stand-alone article or stand-alone list... 'Significant coverage' means that sources address the subject directly in detail

There are no books about this man, no independent third parties writing about his life. How does this man satisfy the notability criteria of Wikipedia? Writing some popular software does not, in itself, make a person notable. The software is notable, the author is not. 90.193.161.42 (talk) 14:25, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Scott James Remnant. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://segfault.org/about.phtml?mode=2

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 00:37, 1 April 2016 (UTC)