Talk:Scott Jay Kenyon

Thank you for accepting my first article. It will be great to have feedback - I am planning to write others on this general topic - Lee Hartmann is next on my list - I added some categories to the article & fixed up a few cosmetic issues with the Reference list Seriouscallersonly (talk) 21:18, 2 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Good constructive work. I hope to see more of it. Some feedback
 * The lead can be fleshed out a little more. Essentially, it should be able to be read as a stand alone summary of the article. (see WP:LEAD). At the very least it should contain some information about why this individual is notable. (What sets him apart from other academics).
 * Since references are formatted as superscript footnotes there is no need to separate them with interpunction. (Some editors do like to separate them with spaces)
 * Since this is an article about a living person, it is essential that all biographical statements are referenced. If no secondary source can be found, at least cite the persons web site as a source. (That source should be at least free of libel.)
 * Keep up the good work.TR 10:25, 7 November 2012 (UTC)