Talk:Scott Jurek

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 one external links on Scott Jurek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20141215090638/http://www.nytimes.com/best-sellers-books/2012-06-24/hardcover-nonfiction/list.html to http://www.nytimes.com/best-sellers-books/2012-06-24/hardcover-nonfiction/list.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080907071835/http://www2.css.edu/publications/times/fall04/fall04_2.pdf to http://www2.css.edu/publications/times/fall04/fall04_2.pdf
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120402180950/http://voyageurtrailrun.blogspot.com/p/results.html to http://voyageurtrailrun.blogspot.com/p/results.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110923175938/http://www.scottjurek.com:80/ to http://www.scottjurek.com/#/highlights/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110810121017/http://ws100.com:80/historybyyear.htm to http://ws100.com/historybyyear.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120325235334/http://www.ultrarunning.com/ultra/features/world/a-successful-return-to-th.shtml to http://www.ultrarunning.com/ultra/features/world/a-successful-return-to-th.shtml
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150911190142/http://blog.scottjurek.com:80/post/128737480319/case-dismissed to http://blog.scottjurek.com/post/128737480319/case-dismissed
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110917060931/http://www.scottjurek.com:80/blog/2010/05/24/this-is-what-you-came-for/ to http://www.scottjurek.com/blog/2010/05/24/this-is-what-you-came-for/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110923175938/http://www.scottjurek.com:80/ to http://www.scottjurek.com/#/bio/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:32, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Scott Jurek. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101015065553/http://www.runnersworld.com/article/0,7120,s6-243-297--13460-1-1X2X3X4X5X6X7X8X9X10X11X12-12,00.html to http://www.runnersworld.com/article/0,7120,s6-243-297--13460-1-1X2X3X4X5X6X7X8X9X10X11X12-12,00.html
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.scottjurek.com/
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://ws100.com/historybyyear.htm
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20130121165550/http://www.duluthnewstribune.com/event/article/id/168720/group/homepage/ to http://www.duluthnewstribune.com/event/article/id/168720/group/homepage/
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://blog.scottjurek.com/post/128737480319/case-dismissed
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.scottjurek.com/blog/2010/05/24/this-is-what-you-came-for/
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.scottjurek.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:55, 2 January 2018 (UTC)

"Fancruft"/NPOV Template
Hi, I do not understand the meaning of the "fancruft"/NPOV template on the article. Could I have some clarification as to what specifically needs to be cleaned up? Cheers. XRENEGADEx (talk) 06:54, 19 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Hey, ! Yes, phrases like "was one of the most dominant ultramarathon runners in the world" are a problem. Unless someone else is saying them -- and then we should be using a quote and attributing that quote -- then it's just the editor's opinion. We WP editors don't insert our own opinions into articles. :) The entire article has problems like that, plus a lot of unsourced material. Anything we can't find a source for doesn't belong in the article, even if it's demonstrably true, because if no one else is talking about it anywhere, it's not important enough to include in a WP article. For instance that he was valedictorian of his hs class. Or the list of accomplishments, almost all of which are unsourced. Someone else should be talking abou this stuff, or we don't include it.


 * I answered you at my talk page, too, but let's keep this discussion here. ----valereee (talk) 13:41, 19 November 2019 (UTC)


 * OK! I will work on cleaning up the article, adding sources, and removing opinionated statements. Cheers! XRENEGADEx (talk) 21:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)