Talk:Scottish art/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Lemurbaby (talk · contribs) 07:09, 21 July 2013 (UTC)


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

Comments

 * File:Cadell, The Vase of Water.jpg needs a US copyright tag
 * Aside from that one detail, I think this is meets GA criteria. For it to pass FA, it will probably need more development of the sculpture, decorative objects, textiles and other non-painting forms of art. This is a great overview - your work on Scotland is truly impressive. Thank you! - Lemurbaby (talk) 07:09, 21 July 2013 (UTC)


 * I have fixed that one issue. Many thanks for a rapid review. Much appreciated.--  SabreBD  (talk ) 10:03, 21 July 2013 (UTC)