Talk:Scouring (textiles)

Awful
I just read this joke of an article. It is awful. The writer should be ashamed. I realise that the writer doesn't have decent command of english, but the lead is so innaccurate as to be a joke. Some of the most basic details that belong in the lead are simply not present in the article. -Roxy the grumpy dog . wooF 16:14, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * What is a troll? Trolling is any deliberate and intentional attempt to disrupt the reliability of Wikipedia for its editors, administrators, developers, and other people who work to create content for and help run Wikipedia. Trolling is a violation of the implicit rules of Internet social spaces and is often done to inflame or invite conflict. Do not feed the trolls.They can trap you and block you even after violating 3RR. RV (talk) 16:30, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Have you any intention to correct this article? If not, I will remove the stuff that is innaccurate, does not belong, or is off-topic. -Roxy the grumpy dog . wooF 16:54, 27 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Dealing with trolls How well do you know about it? If that's really bad, try AFD. Remember Performance (textiles) or Ninon. This is your past history. . . . . . . . You have to be ashamed of yourself? It sounds like you're awful not the article. RV (talk) 04:26, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * This is a good list of some your poor articles but there are many more unfortunatly, so what is your point? -Roxy the grumpy dog . wooF 14:15, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately for you, I'll add more to this list. So what is your point? RV (talk) 14:30, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * perhaps it might be more productive to comment on content, not on the contributor. Brunton (talk) 17:44, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
 * NO one is exceptional, Policies are standards all users should normally follow. As per them this article is awful, the articles are poor, which they were failed to delete. Do you think their remarks are within the policies. Thanks RV (talk) 04:34, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
 * Do you have anything to say about the article? I agree that it has issues, for example the sentence fragment defining saponification is an exact copy of text from Mark Harris: Confronting Global Climate Change (Routledge, 2019), so I’m removing it. It’s unnecessary in any case, as the process is described in the previous sentence, and the following one says it’s called saponification. I can’t speak to the omissions mentioned by Roxy, but there is certainly material that needs copyediting, and parts that just don’t seem to make sense. It doesn’t really give a clear picture. Brunton (talk) 09:32, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
 * You must have seen. I am still working on it. Moreover, improvement is a continual process.   There is no time limit, i am doing it as per my understanding . Secondly, It is a team work. What is unclear to you both? Let's discuss .  RV (talk) 09:50, 29 July 2021 (UTC)