Talk:Scream (Kelis song)/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 01:02, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:05, 31 March 2011 (UTC) Substantive review to be posted within a day or so. Jezhotwells (talk) 01:05, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * Many other critics stated how the song's composition could be split into different sections, ungrammatical
 * "Scream" is an up-tempo, synthpop,[1] electro-dance[2] and techno[3] song with elements of house[4] and soft-rock.[3]  So, are you trying to say that it is a mish-mash of several music genres?
 * The song received generally mixed to positive reviews.  What is that supposed to mean?
 * Sarah Bee of BBC Music agreed compared the song to works by Dutch house DJ Fedde Le Grand, ungrammatical
 * "Scream" was recorded at 'Casa de Kelis' and mixed at 'Gum Prod Studio' in Paris. Incorrect use of quotes, what is 'Casa de Kelis' supposed to mean?
 * This fails the reasonably well written criterion. Should never have been nominated without a thorough copy-edit.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Shopping sites such as 7digital and amazon are not reliable sources. Please see many archived discussions at WP:RSN
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Details of production of the song are needed. Trivia such as the nipple incident are irrelevant.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * Tagged and captioned.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * ON hold for a thorough copy-edit, reference improvements, and broader coverage. Seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 09:45, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, it has been a week and no response has been made, or any edits made to the article, even though the nominator has been editing throughout the period. A note was left on the nominator's talk page seven days ago, so I shall not be listing at this time. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:18, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
 * ON hold for a thorough copy-edit, reference improvements, and broader coverage. Seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 09:45, 31 March 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, it has been a week and no response has been made, or any edits made to the article, even though the nominator has been editing throughout the period. A note was left on the nominator's talk page seven days ago, so I shall not be listing at this time. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:18, 6 April 2011 (UTC)