Talk:SeaTac/Airport station/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MrWooHoo (talk · contribs) 14:24, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Hi, I'm MrWooHoo. I'd like to quickly explain how I'll be reviewing this article. I will do a general review (checking the criteria), then doing an in-depth prose and source review. Thanks! Mr WooHoo ( T  •  C ) 14:25, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Prose Review
Note: If you have changed the sentence that needed to be corrected, press Enter and start off the line with, then use ✅ or ✅ If the change was only partially done use, and or ❌ if the change could not occur. (If you would explain why, I would be greatly appreciated :P) To see code, go to edit source and copy the code.


 * Delink "Airport Expressway" so it doesn't show as a redlink.
 * ✅ I will re-add the link when the article is created (I have notes ready in my sandbox, but they're not complete enough for a decent article).


 * "Mowat Construction" also does not need to be linked. (no redlinks isn't a part of the GA criteria, however it may help you on the way to FA)


 * "The station was designed by David Hewitt of Hewitt Architects and emphasizes a theme of "flight"." - Why does David Hewitt need to be specifically mentioned, and why is flight in quotes?
 * Hewitt needs mention as he is a notable local architect (who worked on other stations and may meet notability for an article); as for the flight in quotes, it's a direct quote from the architect meant to place emphasis on the word "flight". It was copied verbatim from the firm's website and the DJC article (a new reference added to the section), the latter of which passed professional copyediting, so I assume that it would be correct to add quotes.  Sounder Bruce  02:25, 28 January 2017 (UTC)
 * All concerns have been addressed, and I now believe that this article has met the GA criteria. Passing now! Mr WooHoo  ( T  •  C ) 02:57, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Source Review
No issues from sources that I can see.