Talk:SeaTwirl

There are four independent references in this article which are not connected to the SeaTwirl entity and which provide somewhat reliable info on the concept : NyTeknik, Main(e), GoodEnvironment and GizMag. None of them confirm independently that the SeaTwirl has stored energy using seawater.

None of the previous references confirm independently that the prototype was succesful or comparatively cheap, so I had to dig up the Main(e) ref which simply says succesful but does not say whether that is an independent confirmation or merely a rehash of SeaTwirl statement. For now, we must take Main(e)s word for it.

EWEA is the publisher, not the author, and should be put after the title similar to the other refs. The word "seatwirl" no longer produces hits on Chalmers. TGCP (talk) 19:34, 27 March 2012 (UTC)


 * in my opionion there is a huge probability that SeaTwirl is a scam, they provide no real scientific datas and they made so much ads on the internet 78.227.78.135 (talk) 21:59, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on SeaTwirl. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110726063132/http://www.stingday.se/SV/39/medverkande-innovationsbolag to http://www.stingday.se/SV/39/medverkande-innovationsbolag

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 03:32, 26 February 2016 (UTC)