Talk:Seabrook Island, South Carolina

200 BC?
The first line of the "History" section - "Seabrook has a known archaeological history dating back to approximately 200 B.C." - seems to have no context, no relevance to anything else in the document, and seems unsubstantiated - a basic google search finds nothing about this. In fact, if you google anything about Seabrook Island & 200 BC, or archaeological findings, it seems to mostly come back with sites that have copied the wikipedia article verbatim, without doing any fact-checking themselves. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ishmayl (talk • contribs) 13:30, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Digging a bit more, I found this link that tells a bit more:  http://books.google.com/books?id=Q899oPRI3q0C&pg=PA35&lpg=PA35&dq=seabrook+island+archaeology+200+BC&source=bl&ots=y06_LRzhrR&sig=nJEJpbCzM5nqNFrZjwEIrBfprHc&hl=en&sa=X&ei=rzTtUfLeGIaM9AST64CwAw&ved=0CFUQ6AEwBg#v=onepage&q=seabrook%20island%20archaeology%20200%20BC&f=false ...this is from "Insiders' Guide to Charleston Including Mt. Pleasant, Summerville, Kiawah, and Other Islands" in 2007, and at least provides a bit more information, though there is still no documentation from any actual studies or reports. -Brandon (talk) 13:40, 22 July 2013 (UTC)Ishmayl