Talk:Seagalogy

Untitled
I created this article about the book recently published about the martial arts actor Steven Seagal for the same reason someone would create an article for a new movie by Steven Seagal. It is for general interest and as an interesting item relating to a person of cultural prominence in the world today. I do not work for the publishers or know the author or Steven Seagal or anyone related to this - but I own the book and it's really good. Why would it be blatant advertising to have an article about this book and not be blatant advertising to have an article about any of his movies? I have also inserted a reference on the main Steven Seagal page saying that this book exists.

I have removed the quotes from reviews for the book, as I can see that that makes it seem like this article exists to promote the book. How should I ensure that the article does not break any regulations regarding advertising? I believe that an entry for this book should exist on wikipedia.
 * Assert it's notability on the article and add sources and references UKWikiGuy (talk) 12:12, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

Added many reviews and citations as suggested by the previous editor. The book is notable as it is the first and (as of March 2014), ONLY exhaustive study of Steven Seagal's filmography. That makes it absolutely relevant and completely inescapable for any discussion of the topic. Every one of Seagal's films has it's own wiki page, and this book is only in-depth study which ties them together thematically, making it relevant to most if not all of those films. Obviously, not every book of film criticism deserves its own wiki page, but given the uniqueness of this one and the unusual theory which it forwards, I think Seagalogy is one that doesMr Subtlety (talk) 22:50, 9 March 2014 (UTC)