Talk:Sean Chu

use of the word alleged
Re this revert, I feel we should still use the word "alleged". Chu has not admitted to being guilty of sexual assault. There has been no criminal verdict, since he was never charged with a criminal offense. He was convicted of professional misconduct in a quasi-judicial legal process. We can say he engaged in professional misconduct, as a matter of fact, without using the word "alleged". But, by saying he's guilt of sexual assault, we're essentially doing WP:SYNTH, which is combining facts to make our own conclusion. We need a consensus of reliable sources stating he committed sexual assault, before we can say that as fact. Note, that the source cited actually uses the term "sexual contact" in the headline, and "alleged" before saying "sexual assault". So, your actually trying to get Wikipedia to go further than what the source does. Please show a reliable source that states as fact, he us guilty of sexual assault. We must closely follow what the sources say, and not go a single step beyond. -Rob (talk) 23:09, 24 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Interesting. Can you add the court documents? Tallard (talk) 06:27, 13 March 2024 (UTC)