Talk:Sean Maluta

Contract with WWE
The article currently says that Maluta is "not officially signed" by WWE. It has occurred to me that he would have a contract to appear, so he is signed by WWE. The word "officially" is redundant when referring to contracts - there is no such thing as an "unofficial" contract that is legally binding (i.e., not fraudulent). I think the correct phrase would be that he is "not kayfabe signed" if that is a part of the storyline. If his contractual status is not a part of the storyline, the phrase should be removed entirely. I'm removing the reference to his contractual status as it is unsourced, but I am open to discussion. Jack N. Stock (talk) 19:29, 22 January 2017 (UTC)