Talk:Sean Parlaman

Hardly a “coatrack article” or “content fork”
The Wikipedia jargon article “Coatrack” plainly defines
 * A coatrack article is a Wikipedia article that ostensibly discusses the nominal subject, but in reality is a cover for a tangentially related bias subject. The nominal subject is used as an empty coatrack, which ends up being mostly obscured by the "coats".

This article is plainly not about someone or something other than Sean Parlaman. The Wikipedia jargon article “Content fork” defines
 * A content fork is usually an unintentional creation of several separate articles all treating the same subject.

A simple search of Wikipedia for “Sean Parlaman” would have revealed that, while he is mentioned in a few other articles (which link to this article), there are as yet no alternate articles on the same subject. (Labelling something a possible “content fork” based upon purest conjecture is poor policy; the tag could then be applied to every article on Wikipedia.) —SlamDiego&#8592;T 02:40, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Clyde Lewis
Has Clyde Lewis written this article? It seems so and reads like his sad tabloid-gossip pieces. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.51.138.190 (talk) 02:17, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * As far as I know, Clyde Lewis had little-or-nothing to do with the writing of this article. And what you're offering here is argument-by-sneer and personal attack on its editors. —SlamDiego&#8592;T 03:39, 19 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Your conjecture that I am Clyde Lewis isn't an improvement on the above argument-by-sneer. —SlamDiego&#8592;T 22:52, 20 April 2009 (UTC)