Talk:Second Epistle to the Corinthians

=Cleanup-Rewrite=

Untitled
I don't know what's happened to this page but it has become a total mess. There are numerous facts but much less citation and it's my personal opinion that the number of quotes on this page is extremely excessive. To make matters worse, it has somehow been blended with the talk page (perhaps vandalism?). Given the significance of this article and the severity of the problem, I'd say it's in need of immediate attention that is beyond the scope of my humble editing abilities. Thank you Finn zee Fox (talk) 06:30, 17 August 2008 (UTC)


 * I think that these Bible book pages are interesting only for Christians (and such) of the more zealous kind - they deserve some general stories based on some main stream Christian interpretations (archbishop of Cantebury, papal and the counterparts for Lutheran and Calvinists), but doesn't get the proper attention for the risk of conflicts, so that the pages in practice serve as grafitti boards for fundamentalist passers-by personal interpretations. Some systematic collaboration might be a solution. Said: Rursus (☻) 09:24, 21 November 2008 (UTC)

I agree. Such collaboration could be incredibly effective in protecting these pages. Likewise, could it be useful, or even possible, to grant these pages semi-protection? Finn zee Fox (talk) 02:23, 4 February 2009 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Epistle to the Romans which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 16:29, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
 * This move discussion has been closed - BobKilcoyne (talk) 01:14, 31 March 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Second Epistle to the Corinthians. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090615155507/http://www.wlsessays.net/node/1450 to http://www.wlsessays.net/node/1450
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090616162121/http://www.wlsessays.net/node/1451 to http://www.wlsessays.net/node/1451
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090616164703/http://www.wlsessays.net/node/1452 to http://www.wlsessays.net/node/1452
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090616162126/http://www.wlsessays.net/node/1453 to http://www.wlsessays.net/node/1453
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090616162212/http://www.wlsessays.net/node/1454 to http://www.wlsessays.net/node/1454
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090616164741/http://www.wlsessays.net/node/1455 to http://www.wlsessays.net/node/1455

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 07:15, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

Reference to Paul's brother Titus
Should this article say that this book of the New Testament implies that Titus was Paul's brother? In it, he says that because he did not find his brother Titus, he went on to Macedonia. YTKJ (talk) 21:24, 17 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Brother there is in the loose sense. Jack Upland (talk) 06:38, 23 June 2024 (UTC)