Talk:Section 91(2) of the Constitution Act, 1867

I deleted the segment stating that PIPEDA was "upheld" as a valid exercise of Parliament's trade and commerce power. There were no citations provided, and as far as I'm aware, no court has ever been asked to rule on the constitutional validity of PIPEDA. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.67.6.173 (talk) 22:07, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

"Trade and commerce" listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Trade and commerce. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 09:39, 10 November 2019 (UTC)