Talk:Sectionals (Glee)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Rcej (Robert) - talk 07:19, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Cool... just a couple of things:


 * The url for ref no. 16 goes to the same webpage as ref. 14


 * Could stand another pic. Maybe of Jayma, since critic mentioned the Will/Emma kiss seemed too early; or Lynch, since Sue was sent to the wood shed :) Rcej (Robert) - talk 07:19, 31 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Oops, I've fixed the refs, not sure how that happened! There used to be a picture of Jayma in an earlier draft of the article, but I guess someone must have removed it without me noticing. I've added it back in, anyway :) Assuming that's everything okay, I just want to say thank you again for reviewing so many of these articles! I was hoping to get them all to GA before the series started back in April, but I was never really convinced I'd manage it. It's been great working with you :) Frickative  12:32, 31 March 2010 (UTC)


 * Glad to've gotten to work with you too :) Really, when I reviewed the "Vitamin D" article, I'd never seen the show. I got curious, and went to the fox website and watched the earliest ep they had, which was "Wheels". Loved it, and I eventually googled/found/watched all 13 episodes online too. They're scattered here and there, but I found them all! I adore the show completely now! Rcej (Robert) - talk 03:37, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Results of review

 * GA review (see here for criteria)

The article Sectionals passes this review, and has been upgraded to good article status. The article is found by the reviewing editor to be deserving of good article status based on the following criteria:
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: