Talk:Secular music

Copyright Violation?
Okay, just a thought. The wording in this article seems to be pretty good (or it may just be that I haven't had enough sleep) but the original poster misspelled some common words. Moreover, there was a pronunciation key in the first draft of the article as if they copied it out of a dictionary. I did some googling but was unable to find anything. It could be perfectly legit, but it just struck me as odd. --Douglas Whitaker 04:41, 20 July 2006 (UTC)

Thank you for pointing this out Douglas. For I too agree in your free will speach. Though, it happens not to be as entertaining as you'd think. For if you would kindly do so, and show me some examples of the words that you had considered yourself to be misleading, or not spelled correctly. Therefore, if you shall not give me examples of these words prompt, i will be forced to blame (if you will) you for not having enough sleep. Thank you for your cooperation, TWT; The Wikipedia Team. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.32.140.169 (talk) 13:28, 2 January 2009 (UTC)


 * I have removed the prod tag which proposed that this article be deleted, because I think that this article has merit and so should not be deleted from Wikipedia. I'm leaving this message here as notification. If you still think the article should be deleted, please don't add the prod template back to the article as that process is only to be used when there is no opposition. Warden (talk) 22:47, 14 April 2012 (UTC)

Better definition needed
Update this with more “modern” definition. I sent a young relative here to get a good definition of “secular music”. The history is relevant and nice but no where is the term actually defined/explained in modern terms or otherwise. Torquemata (talk) 04:04, 2 December 2020 (UTC)